Should police officers be allowed to moonlight as private security providers Essay Example

Should police officers be allowed to moonlight as private security providers Essay There are very few professions nowadays that provide financially fulfilling compensation. Not everybody can be a surgeon, lawyer, professional athlete or celebrity: professions that are sure to provide luxurious living. Often times, working men and women have to work multiple jobs to provide for their families, send their kids to school, or simply just to get by in life. Almost every human being on the planet has a right to earn decent wages to get a decent living, even if this means juggling different lines of work. People who hold sensitive public office positions are among the few exceptions. They need to give their full attention to the job at hand.   Included in this exclusive list are the people in the law enforcement field. Police officers should not be allowed to take off duty jobs which conflict with their status as police officers.Being a cop means you have accepted a high profile position with little or no reward. The starting annual income for a police officer in New Yo rk is estimated to be about $ 25,100 (AP, 2007). Plumbers and Sanitation workers make more. Not to demean the other professions but police officers put their lives at risk every time they put on the uniform so they are grossly underpaid. It is sad that they do not earn more, but they still should not be allowed to take on private security positions to earn extra income. Taking on a similar profession without the safeguards that make law enforcement work in the first place, can lead to disastrous repercussions. Therefore, they should not be allowed to moonlight as private security providers.Conflict of interestMost cities throughout the United States have police officers take on private security work when off duty. This could spell conflict of interest on so many levels. A cop’s loyalty is supposed to be to the general public. They are tasked with implementing peace and order in their area of responsibility regardless of race, age, gender or social status. On the other hand, a private security officer’s loyalty is to the individual or corporation that hired him. The Director of the Juvenile Justice Center in Boston, Lisa Thurau-Gray, says that the private police prioritize the interest of their employer more than public safety and rights (Goldstein, 2007). If the interest of public and private employer crossover, it is not surprising for the police officer to be conflicted and confused. As an example, suppose an off duty police officer operates as personal security for a private individual, lets say that the individual is suspected of a crime while in the protection of the off duty officer. Once media learns that a cop is somehow involved, how then is the police officer supposed to position himself to preserve his integrity? When a cop witnesses a crime that requires immediate action like a hostage situation or a bank heist, is he supposed to let it pass because he’s on private security detail? The only definitive answer is that he should n ot have been in the position to choose in the first place.Possible human rights violationState and nationwide laws have provisions that protect citizens from law enforcement violations. Search of ones premises or belongings require a search warrant, arresting a suspect needs a warrant of arrest, questioning suspects must be in the presence of a lawyer. These are just some of the rights afforded to citizens. Nonconformance with any of these requisites is considered a violation under the law. The police department and the arresting officer can be sued for such erroneous misdeeds. This is not necessarily true for private security providers. While off duty as a cop, a private security enforcer does not necessarily need a lawyer to extract information from a suspect. Miranda rights do not need to be enforced. This means that an officer who has internal knowledge of the â€Å"rights and wrongs† of police procedure can work around them on his private time. A situation like this coul d lead to less civil interrogation techniques that could lead to brutality, which might not even fall under the category of police brutality because the officer is technically off-duty. This is not to insinuate that this is normal practice, this situation would surely not be of the common variety, only that the opportunity to take advantage of police protocols presents itself if a public law enforcer is allowed to spend his off-duty hours doing private police work.Paid on the clockSpecial police or private police are paid by the hour. As with other private companies, private security providers want the most of what they pay their employees and try to cut back on unnecessary expenses to save company money. While other companies generate savings by cutting back on supplies, energy consumption, and recycling, private security firms save by cutting back on court appearances and testifying before the judiciary. Police Captain Kenny Mangum and police officer Matt Saylors, while on patrol as private security for Capitol Special Police (CSP), found illegal drugs and handguns in a car of a convicted felon. Despite the potential danger of civilians using drugs and guns, the two off-duty officers did not make the arrest but did call in on-duty police officers to do it. CSP reasons that they are careful in billing clients with time spent testifying and therefore make arrests only when absolutely necessary (Goldstein, 2007). Such a choice has potentially deadly consequences had the driver and his companions decided to use the weapons at their disposal. Had Mangum and Saylors not been allowed to do private security work, they would have undoubtedly proceeded with an immediate arrest since diffusing dangerous situations as quickly as possible is part of the police officer’s job description. This is clearly one instance where the moonlighting sideline got in the way of what would have normally been a routine bust.Perception of a protection racketThe public police popul ation in the United States number to around 700,000 officers (Goldstein, 2007). They are outnumbered by private security police, 5 to 1 (Schneier, 2007). Despite their lack in numbers, it is their sworn duty to protect the citizens as they patrol their areas of their jurisdiction. Now, private subdivisions want the same security. Private suburbs in Maryland and Virginia, among others, have begun to entice police officers to enforce public laws in their areas, presumably for a fee (VIC, 2000). This gives a negative impression to tax payers that certain locations are more protected than others. Public trust is fragile, so even the slightest perception that law enforcement favors those who can pay for it must always be avoided.Separation between private and public policeThe private sector should have the right to protect their interests and hire additional security. It makes sense to try and hire police officers because they are better trained, experienced on the field and are best sui ted for the job. But cops, even off-duty, should not be allowed to moonlight as private security providers. The public needs, demands their full attention. Although they work in shifts with almost no overtime pay, they’re actually much like doctors. They’re always on-call 24-7. Carl Dunde, a police officer with 18 years of experience, said that police officers are never really off-duty (Dunde, 2007).   A cop can go shopping, jogging, or walking their dog, but once a thief comes running, they come running after them, whether it’s in uniform or in their pajamas. A police officer’s work is never done.If law enforcers want to earn more and serve the private sector, they should quit. They can make their services available to the private security institutions and perhaps make a lucrative career out of it. But for the meantime, being a cop is public service. This may sound cheesy but public service is public trust. In order for the people to trust the law, its enforcers must give it their full attention. Crime doesn’t take a day off, it’s another corny line but it’s true, officers of the law shouldn’t either. The only defense the public has is the people enforce the laws of the land. â€Å"To serve and protect†, that’s an officer’s motto. It never said anything about clocking out.

Free Essays on Utalitarianism

Utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine which essentially states that which is good is that which brings about the most happiness to the most people. John Stuart Mill believed that the decisions we make should always benefit the most people as much as possible regardless of the consequences to the minority or even yourself. He would say all that matters in the decision of right versus wrong is the amount of happiness produced by the consequences. In the decisions we make Mill would say that we need to weigh the outcomes and make our decision based on that outcome that benefits the majority. For Mill, pleasure is the only desirable consequence of our decisions or actions. The Judeo-Christian ethic embraced by Augustine places questions of right and wrong under the authority of a divine creator - God. The Judeo-Christian ethic can be summed up in one word - Love. In Matthew 22:40 Jesus says: â€Å"Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love you neighbor as yourself.† When Augustine said, â€Å"Love God and do what you will†, I believe he is asserting the fact that when a person loves God truly he or she is in God’s will. John 14:15 says, â€Å"If you love me, you will obey what I command.† If a person obeys God which is loving God and loving his creation then a person is in his will. The decisions made by a person in God’s will are thus ethical decision in view of the fact that God is the ultimate moral authority. To help his creation in determining right from wrong he has provided the Bible. Although not every ethical question is covered in the Bible he has also given us his Spirit for guidance. Utilitarianism like the Judeo-Christian ethic is viewing others in a high regard. Utilitarian desire the greatest happiness as an end and the Judeo-Christian perspective seeks love and obedience to God. These two ethical... Free Essays on Utalitarianism Free Essays on Utalitarianism Utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine which essentially states that which is good is that which brings about the most happiness to the most people. John Stuart Mill believed that the decisions we make should always benefit the most people as much as possible regardless of the consequences to the minority or even yourself. He would say all that matters in the decision of right versus wrong is the amount of happiness produced by the consequences. In the decisions we make Mill would say that we need to weigh the outcomes and make our decision based on that outcome that benefits the majority. For Mill, pleasure is the only desirable consequence of our decisions or actions. The Judeo-Christian ethic embraced by Augustine places questions of right and wrong under the authority of a divine creator - God. The Judeo-Christian ethic can be summed up in one word - Love. In Matthew 22:40 Jesus says: â€Å"Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love you neighbor as yourself.† When Augustine said, â€Å"Love God and do what you will†, I believe he is asserting the fact that when a person loves God truly he or she is in God’s will. John 14:15 says, â€Å"If you love me, you will obey what I command.† If a person obeys God which is loving God and loving his creation then a person is in his will. The decisions made by a person in God’s will are thus ethical decision in view of the fact that God is the ultimate moral authority. To help his creation in determining right from wrong he has provided the Bible. Although not every ethical question is covered in the Bible he has also given us his Spirit for guidance. Utilitarianism like the Judeo-Christian ethic is viewing others in a high regard. Utilitarian desire the greatest happiness as an end and the Judeo-Christian perspective seeks love and obedience to God. These two ethical...

Case Study - planning & strategy in small business Essay

Case Study - planning & strategy in small business - Essay Example 56). His management of finances proved to be good. As the owner of the firm, James has proved skillful in managing its finances and thus ensuring that success is attained. The overall overheads in the company have been minimal by the reduced cases of unnecessary taking of risks and by assigning all work in the firm on a sub-contract basis. The reduction of bad debts is another measure of his finance control. His checking of the profit margins involving all the contracts the company awards, the minimal cases of business bad debts and the leasing of land for business expansion has boosted his finance managerial skills. He is experienced and understands the market demand for the business. His vast knowledge on the relationship between employee productivity and their comfort prompted his venturing into this type of business. His business idea was spurred by his experience in the building and construction field and the knowledge on the existing market competition (Thomas 2006, p. 190). The ch ampioning of new ideas and development of existing ones has ensured growth. He is inexperienced at controlling and managing human resources. The result of his taking of human resource management position, which requires a competent person, has led to his arrogant nature in relation to employee-employer relationship. He cannot delegate duties as a result of his mistrust of employees. The effect is reduction in employee performance as a result of lack of team spirit and motivation which develops into low productivity. This is the case in Comfort Homes where James, despite his lack of experience in human resource management takes the position and controls everything without considering his employees in any decision making. He, however, gets things done but the employees do not feel as part of the company. This has led to poor communication system at the firm and lack of new ideas to steer the business towards growth. For instance, the failure to involve Kevin

Race and Your Community Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Race and Your Community - Essay Example The period of the Great Depression also saw a huge influx of immigrants from different parts of Europe. Italian nationals were seeking refuge from political persecution and poverty and reached the shores of New England with high hopes. But the conditions prevailing at that time was hostile to its new citizens. The domination by the White Anglo Saxon Protestants (WASP) at that time was uncontested and overwhelming. Though the Italian American community was technically "white" as well, their status was equal to that of black Americans. The trend persisted the following years, culminating during the Second World War, where Italy was at war with America. The civil rights of many Italian Americans were stripped and many innocent citizens were suspected of espionage and subversion. But my grandfather lived to see a positive transformation of this situation after the Second World War. The post War period saw renewed respect for all ethnic minorities given the fact that a significant percent age of armed forces came from the underclass and minorities. (Alba, 1985) As for our own leaders - their take on the situation was a little ambivalent. While blatant societal injustice caused rightful indignation, a corner of their hearts still felt indebted to this "land of the free" for gracefully embracing and welcoming these new citizens from afar. Such feeling for their adopted land is understandable, as my grandfather recollected the stories of persecution and oppression in his native land. (Alba, 1985) Another influential person in our family was our grandmother. Looking back, she was the last link to our ancestral native land. Not only she could speak fluent Italian, but also render an Opera or two. She was also adept at making marinara and rolling gnocchi. I remember how when I was a toddler, she would sing lullabies in Italian to put me to sleep. Much of my knowledge of Christianity is credited to her passing

Sysytems and Operations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Sysytems and Operations - Essay Example Sweden’s main focus is to have an increase in the information technology in order to have a stronger digital economy. Everyday life in Sweden is based completely on technology. Starting from waking up in the morning to sleeping at night every single activity by citizens involves technology. Transportation, medical, banking, educational sector all are concerned with having maximum technology so that best quality service can be provided to the citizens of the country. This is being done so that maximum number of people can be facilitated and the services provided would be equal for everyone. In this manner the quality of service being provided has also improved. This shows that the society has moved towards modernization along with innovation and good. The country has been changing and this can been shown in a manner that the three major sectors (individual, business and government) are benefitting from this shift to digital economy. The change can be seen in a example that at the grocery store in Sweden the shop keeper is selling medicine without prescription. All the customer need is their bank card and identity number in order to purchase the medicine. People in Sweden are working on everything through the touch screen from seeking advices of health experts to purchasing products everything is done through touch screens. The list of examples keep growing as Sweden is a digital economy and most of the things are now digital. The government is overwhelmed by the performance of this system as it has been providing services to people in medical sector that people are benefitting from it. This system is also helping them in banking, parking lots, paying bills, education facilities that there has been a boom in these sectors. Due to this the government is now having goals to export the medical system to different countries to gain from this system. By

The Philosophy of Niccolo Machiavelli

The Philosophy of Niccolo Machiavelli Who was Machiavelli the prince? What were his beliefs? Machiavelli was an Italian student of history, who was an ambassador in Florence Italy. He was a long time official in the Florentine Republic, with obligations in government and military issues. Machiavelli composed, in his novel the prince, the solid focal points in political power, including religion and good conduct. Machiavelli, composition amid a time of sensational change known as the Italian Renaissance, showed demeanor towards numerous issues, basic politics, which upheld his conviction that solid government was the most critical component in the public eye. These demeanor and thoughts were extremely proper for the time in light of the fact that they focused on solid, unified force, the main sort of initiative that appeared to be working all through Europe, and which was the component Italy was needing. Machiavelli was a political realist. He thought there were sure abilities and qualities required to turn into a political ruler. In his work, The Prince, Machiavelli gives exhortation on the most proficient method to be a fruitful sovereign, or ruler. Effective is incompletely focused around how influential a ruler was amid his lifetime (rule), yet generally focused around how much the sovereign influenced the lives, through laws or societal standards, of future eras. Machiavelli’s main objective was achieving and keeping political force. He accepted the fact individuals were characteristically childish and would, by nature, not regard the law or work for the benefit of all, without urban ethics. The ideas he presented were the best way to control† human urges was to impart national pride and shared admiration for all nationals of a state. The distinction in Crafty thought, as yet ever, from different logicians was he accepted political power was no more defended by religious or profound tenets. In spite of the fact that Machiavelli accepted this to be genuine, he still knew it was essential for natives to keep up a pledge for the benefit of everyone, through national pride and admiration. An alternate part of varying concocted to this point in time was Machiavelli knew advancing municipal goodness in subjects required the quest for individual freedom. Machiavelli, in his compositions, discusses a few diverse of government. He found himself able to dismantle governments, building the distinction in the middle of new and old governments. The new governments are the hard ones to keep up, on the grounds that individuals are not defenseless to change, indeed they just about rebellion against it, unless the new ruler can address his pledge and keep his guarantees. Machiavelli knew individuals were chiefly worried about their property and prosperity of their gang. He also knew the administrations employment was to ensure both; notwithstanding helping the individuals thrive and take after their souls, maybe. Machiavelli accepted just certain individuals could get to be rulers, in light of the fact that it took an extraordinary kind of individuals. He said rulers are not bound by good demands or social standards. Rulers does not need to maintain all the qualities expected of their natives. While this is genuine, he states that a ruler must be genuine in the public eye, which depicts the majority of the people temperance showed in all the residents. In the event that the individuals accept the ruler is misrepresenting his convictions, they will turn. Then again, when the time comes to settle on a choice outside the domain of subject information, a ruler mu st be savage and readied to do â€Å"whatever it takes â€Å"to guarantee the states success. In the event that this implies the ruler needs to lie or murder, he will. This clarifies why just certain individuals can be rulers. One of Machiavellis most loved illustrations of viable rulers is Cesare Borgia. Borgia was chosen ruler, after his father was chosen as pope. Borgia knew how to obtain regard from his residents through trepidation and control. He likewise gave the individuals a decent government and brought peace and success. The inquiry dependably emerges, however, about what to do with the dissidents, or agitators of a gathering. Borgia dealt with this by enlisting a master. The implementer was accountable for taking care of criminals, normally by death. The authority was a brutal man and summoned fear in the subjects. Borgia did not need his kin to partner him with the master, so he executed him. At the same time he didnt simply kill him; he place him in the town square slice down the middle to show individuals he was not kidding. The natives were in amazement and considered Borgia their saint, for pulverizing the implementer, who they had developed to detest. Notwithstanding how great a ruler Bor gia was however, when the time came to introduce another pope and it wasnt his father, Borgia missed the mark and was no more the ruler. While Machiavelli appeared to put no stock in the part of the resident in deciding a ruler, he thought rulers could ensure their energy by bringing out the affection for their kin. Yet even this isnt sufficient constantly, in light of the inquiry constantly solicited by subjects from its administration, what have you accomplished for me of late. The ruler must secure the residents property, thriving, family, and prosperity. For individuals to lead cheerful, full lives, they must be permitted to do what they need, inside the rules of a state. In any case this is a cycle simpler to keep up, than to start. For individuals to do as they wish, there must be rules set up, yet for rules to be secured, individuals need to recognize what they need to do and what they are not able to do. Here is the reason governments were inherent the primary spot. The gathering of individuals picked somebody to make rules, in light of the fact that individuals needed more than they had. This is the genuine r eason for a ruler, to help make a general public. Rulers having and keeping force, by a â€Å"whatever it takes â€Å"mentality, overwhelmed Machiavelli. This appears to negate what he is saying in regards to the benefit of everyone and metro excellencies. On the off chance that the ruler is just inspired by force, what consideration would he have for the individuals? None, it appears to me. As indicated by Ian Johnston, The Prince was more than a weak endeavor for Machiavelli try and reach some sort of political standard after he had been kicked out and tormented. Johnston accepts The Prince was to a greater degree a parody against rulers and what they remained for. There are a few examples where Machiavelli repudiates himself, frequently inside the same passage. Particularly, Machiavelli accepted rulers should most importantly, ensure their own particular security at whatever expense. In The Prince, he goes to say a standout amongst the most effective methods for securing themselves is to decimate the urban communities as the be st way to hold them. On the off chance that you consider this for a moment, this bodes well. Why would Machiavelli advise rulers the best way to control something is to decimate it. Individuals would not acknowledge control on the off chance that it is taken in such a brutal, merciless way. A few different occurrences of Machiavelli appearing to play around with words a bit, is the point at which he is discussing great laws and great arms. At whatever point, the words great, well, awful, and so on are utilized, there is a reason. These words impart a feeling of ethical quality. Instead of attempting to observe what Machiavelli is truly attempting to say, individuals get stuck on the inclination summoned with these words. Machiavelli has a few likenesses and contrasts contrasted with Islamic and Jewish political thought. The most unmistakable contrast, I think, is the relationship in the middle of religion and theory. Machiavelli doesnt put much stock into the idea of religion. He doesnt accept the state ought to need to rely on upon religious thought to survive. Truly, Machiavelli accepted the Roman Catholic Church was in charge of Italy being part into five states. The congregation separates as opposed to unites. In the Islamic world, religion is the principle string going through and entwining everything. Alfarabi was keen on making a working relationship in the middle of religion and theory. He was one of the first Muslim savants and his work is mulled over as much as Aristotle or Plato, in future eras. Avicenna accepted all components in life were clarified in circumstances and end results terms. The idea of circumstances and end results goes through all the Islamic scholars. For Alfarabi, the ci rcumstances and end results was put to use with reason. For motivation to exist there must be two crucial exercises. The primary is to characterize essential presumptions and definitions that are the beginning stages and building squares of a contention, (reason) and second, check whether finishes of a contention take after intelligently from the contentions fundamental suspicions and definitions, (impact). Avicenna accepted individuals would tame their wishes for the benefit of everyone. This perspective is to some degree like Machiavellis perspective, yet the measures for the benefit of all are characterized diversely for both. People who practice Islam they believe everyone if characterized by the expression of God and translated by reason. They consolidate both to structure a working relationship. I accept the reason the Islamic masterminds partner God with reason, and in this way theory, lies in their lifestyle. The religious pioneers of their time laughed at the thought of rea soning. The religious pioneers accepted if reasoning had merit, what place did religion have? . Scholars in the Muslim world must be acknowledged by one means or another. So they started partner religion and reasoning. They pushed the way that both were overwhelmed by the journey of the great life. The distinction was religion utilized God as their answer and reasoning utilized reason. One common pattern between Machiavelli, the Islamic and Jewish scholars is the conviction that individuals need to lead cheerful, delighted lives, and for this to be fulfilled, an overseeing energy must be available. More than that, individuals need to be included in a political group. Maimonides was a Jewish rationalist. He was additionally a rabbi, making his perspective of logic harmonize with his perspective of religion. He was permitted to decipher the Torah for the normal individuals, on the grounds that it was the conviction that it took exceptional commitment to learn and comprehend the ideas. This thought is like Alfarabis conviction that individuals need to utilize religious ideas and images to comprehend the unpredictable, supreme truth of theory. The way Maimonides leaves the expression of God up to elucidation would appear to be a decent beginning stage for a general public. Instead of lecture the individuals about stuff they can not comprehend, the rabbis capacity is to help them comprehend what is good and bad, additionally to re-decipher the thoughts if circumstances emerge. Here is a spot where I can no discover no pertinence to our general public today. We dont always re-decipher the Scripture. Rather, we base our laws and ethics off an understand ing that is a huge number of years old While most philosophical masterminds take after the same relative rules, there are a couple of contrasts. The thought of religion overwhelming societal standards and inalienable conduct of individuals are both illustrations of contrasting suppositions. Todays general public may have been begun as an application of rationality, yet the expectations made by Machiavelli and different rationalists about the defilement of governments has worked out

The Future :: Argumentative Persuasive Science Papers

The Future It is by following clues that we make discoveries, not by reasoning inductively. Now some people would accept this view but nevertheless argue that in science we cannot avoid reasoning inductively. For , , they say, suppose we have discovered a law of nature—let us say the law that all metals expand when heated. Now in saying that this is a law of nature we are saying that it holds not only in the past but also in the future. If it is a law of nature that all metals expand when heated, then metals will expand when heated not just today but also tomorow. But how do we know they will expand tomorow? Tomorow has not yet come. If we know, we can only know by reasoning inductively (they say). The law has held in the past; therefore it will hold in the future. Reasoning from the past to the future is inductive reasoning. In this paper I want to respond to this argument. My point will be, there is no need to reason inductively even in science. To help make my point I will draw on three examples. Example 1: Station A Suppose you crack ciphers. You have been intercepting messages from a radio station which you have called Station A. The messages transmited by Station A are encrypted by a cipher which you have already broken, a cipher which for your own convenience you have called Cipher X. Because you have already broken Cipher X, for the past six months you have been able to read every single message sent out by Station A. This morning you have intercepted another message. You have not deciphered it yet ... How are you going to decipher your new message? Are you going to decipher it by using Cipher X, the cipher you have broken and which Station A has been using these past six months? I think you are likely to say, 'Of course! ' So you will decipher the new message using Cipher X, as I too if I were in your position. Let us now go over the situation again. You have broken Cipher X. You have been deciphering all messages from Station A using Cipher X. You are now about to decipher this newly intercepted message by using Cipher X. Now considering what you have done and what you are about to do, can we infer that you are reasoning inductively?